Book Description
For Thomas Pynchon, the characteristic features of late capitalismthe rise of the military-industrial complex, consumerism, bureaucratization and specialization in the workplace, standardization at all levels of social life, and the growing influence of the mass mediaall point to a transformation in the way human beings experience time and duration. Focusing on Pynchons novels as representative artifacts of the postwar period, Stefan Mattessich analyzes this temporal transformation in relation not only to Pynchons work but also to its literary, cultural, and theoretical contexts.Mattessich theorizes a new kind of timesubjective displacementdramatized in the parody, satire, and farce deployed through Pynchons oeuvre. In particular, he is interested in showing how this sense of time relates to the counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s. Examining this movement as an instance of flight or escape, and exposing the beliefs behind it, Mattessich argues that the countercultures rejection of the dominant culture ultimately became an act of self-cancellation, a rebellion in which the counterculture found itself defined by the very order it sought to escape. He points to parallels in Pynchons attempts to dramatize and enact a similar experience of time in the doubling-back, criss-crossing, and erasures of his writing. Linking this to the problem of what Henri LeFebvre called "grammatological terrorism"the problem of being trapped within discourses that dictate conditions of possibility and deep structures of beliefMattessich lays out a theory of cultural production centered on the ethical necessity of grasping ones own susceptibility to discursive forms of determination. Lines of Flight will be of interest to scholars engaged by contemporary American literature, literary theory, and the writing of Pynchon, in particular.
From the Publisher
"This is an original and provocative book that makes a significant contribution to studies of Thomas Pynchon, to the literature on Deleuze and Guattari, andmost importantlyto the critical project of reading contemporary literature closely, theoretically, and self-reflexively."Michael Bérubé, Pennsylvania State University "Lines of Flight is an impressive achievement, reminiscent of the work of Fredric Jameson in its engagement with social and political issues, its sensitivity to questions of the ideology of form, and the authority with which it parses complex problems of textuality and discourse and identifies their cultural significance. Pynchon has not had so sympathetic a reader."Hayden White, Stanford University "An amazing book. Mattessich has written a stunningly brilliant, original, and uncompromisingly complicated study of Pynchons novels. In purposefully difficult, yet exhilarating prose, Mattessich explores the meaning of Pynchons obvious self-consciousness about fiction as textual production. . . . I havent come across any work on Pynchon that even approaches the pure intelligence and imagination of Lines of Flight"-- John T. Matthews, Boston University
About the Author
Stefan Mattessich is Professor of English at Santa Monica College.
Lines of Flight: Discursive Time and Countercultural Desire in the Work of Thomas Pynchon SYNOPSIS
For Thomas Pynchon, the characteristic features of late capitalism-the rise
of the military-industrial complex, consumerism, bureaucratization and
specialization in the workplace, standardization at all levels of social life,
and the growing influence of the mass media-all point to a transformation in the
way human beings experience time and duration. Focusing on Pynchon's
novels as representative artifacts of the postwar period, Stefan Mattessich
analyzes this temporal transformation in relation not only to Pynchon's work but
also to its literary, cultural, and theoretical contexts.
Mattessich theorizes a new kind of time-subjective displacement-dramatized in
the parody, satire, and farce deployed through Pynchon's oeuvre. In
particular, he is interested in showing how this sense of time relates to the
counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s. Examining this movement as an instance of
flight or escape, and exposing the beliefs behind it, Mattessich argues that the
counterculture's rejection of the dominant culture ultimately became an act of
self-cancellation, a rebellion in which the counterculture found itself defined
by the very order it sought to escape. He points to parallels in Pynchon's
attempts to dramatize and enact a similar experience of time in the
doubling-back, criss-crossing, and erasures of his writing. Linking this
to the problem of what Henri LeFebvre called "grammatological terrorism"-the
problem of being trapped within discourses that dictate conditions of
possibility and deep structures of belief-Mattessich lays out a theory of
cultural production centered on the ethical necessity of grasping one's own
susceptibility to discursive forms of determination.
Lines of Flight will be of interest to scholars engaged by
contemporary American literature, literary theory, and the writing of Pynchon,
in particular.
About the Author
Stefan Mattessich is Professor of English at Santa Monica College.
WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING
An amazing book. Mattessich has written a stunningly brilliant, original, and uncompromisingly complicated study of Pynchon's novels. In purposefully difficult, yet exhilarating prose, Mattessich explores the meaning of Pynchon's obvious self-consciousness about fiction as textual production. . . . I haven't come across any work on Pynchon that even approaches the pure intelligence and imagination of Lines of Flight John Matthews
Lines of Flight is an impressive achievement, reminiscent of the work of Fredric Jameson in its engagement with social and political issues, its sensitivity to questions of the ideology of form, and the authority with which it parses complex problems of textuality and discourse and identifies their cultural significance. Pynchon has not had so sympathetic a reader. Hayden White
This is an original and provocative book that makes a significant contribution to studies of Thomas Pynchon, to the literature on Deleuze and Guattari, and-most importantly-to the critical project of reading contemporary literature closely, theoretically, and self-reflexively Michael Berube